Some 500,000 people speaking out against a decision in a short period of time can obviously influence you. This kind of reaction can make you change your mind about Bell. However, you never gave any orders; Bell asked the CRTC to provide the 60-day report. After that, one thing led to another. You had to reluctantly support this request, since it complied with the Bernier decision, which calls for the least amount of regulation possible. This is clearly confirmed by one of the directives you gave the CRTC as part of your Order in Council, and it states the following:
(d) the impact of these wholesale requirements unduly impairs the ability of incumbent telephone companies to offer new converged services, such as Internet Protocol Television (IPTV).
This was the directive given, and the way to meet it is through usage-based billing, ostensibly to free up the network, which would include IP television.
Could you explain to us why Decision 2008-117 and Order 2009-111 on speed matching were not compliant with the 2006 Bernier decision?