I appreciate the question, but I don't think it's fair to the CRTC or to the process that I rewrite their decision for them. They're reviewing their decision in good faith. I think that's a commendable thing for the CRTC to do. I will let them, of course, do that. When that decision was communicated by the CRTC chairman, I said it was great that they were reviewing the decision, but they should keep in mind that if they came back with the same decision they had before, that doesn't solve the problem, because we still believe that this does not facilitate competition and choice. So that's the prism through which we are observing the CRTC process. And really it's not only for Tony Clement or anyone else to decide what is acceptable; really it's up to the consumers. And let's give them the ability to say this is acceptable or they're going somewhere else. That's the best model, I think.
On March 1st, 2011. See this statement in context.