I am relatively new to this, but I thought I understood some things during the questions.
We need to go back a bit and remember why we are here today and why we are debating this bill. The NDP had been very aggressive and claimed that the potash situation for Canada was appalling. So this wasn't relevant.
The parties had agreed to have a debate and a full analysis with witnesses. The witnesses were invited and are here.
I find it most unfortunate that the motion from the Liberal party means that people are in the room waiting for us. This is a lack of courtesy. Given the circumstances, which may find us in an election in 24, 48 or 72 hours, it's still fairly incredible.
The reasons why everyone agreed to study this issue are still the same and are still on the table. I don't believe we've exhausted the issue.
Like the NDP, the Bloc Québécois had reasons to believe… If I am not mistaken, they presented this plan to study the issue in depth.
We did not go in depth, far from it. I think that we only scratched the surface. Personally, I think that we should proceed as quickly as possible and listen to the witnesses.