“Control in fact” is a well-known concept in law. There's ample jurisprudence on it. The leading case on this is a case involving Canadian Pacific Airlines. We used that law and jurisprudence and applied it to the facts of the Globalive carrier case.
We came to the conclusion, which we set out in our decision after a lengthy hearing in open court with submissions from both sides, with tests for these factors, that for Globalive, in effect, Canadians did not have control of that corporation. Now, you should know that we do not have the power to give a conditional approval. We could not have said no, you haven't, but we'll give you two years to bring yourselves onside, or something like that. We had to make a decision, yes or no, according to the legislation.
We made that decision and we issued it and that's the end of the story. As far as we are concerned, we applied existing jurisprudence.