As I tried to make clear in our opening statement, we feel that convergence is here. To make a distinction between telecommunications and broadcasting is artificial. It doesn't make sense. As you know, you can watch any television program on the Internet or on cable. When you watch programs, some are interactive, and you can phone in or type and send e-mail messages that appear on the screen. You interact. Is this telecom? Is this broadcasting? Or both?
I mean, it is all one. The technology is one. The industry is one. Legislatively, if you deal with them separately, you're going to force them into artificial distinctions in order to take advantage of the legislation. That's not going to create efficient companies or competitive companies. That's why we say you have to deal with both of them.
But given the very cultural concerns that you've expressed and that we have, etc., we feel that the best way to do it is to simplify the rules, not to have a different rule for holding companies and operating companies. We have special board rules, etc. We don't need all of that.
Make it very simple in regard to any foreign company. As long as the Canadians own 51% of the voting shares and the control in fact is there, that's fine, and they can invest as much as they can in Canada. They can be very successful. I mean, a lot of companies in the past.... Rogers is a perfect example. It had huge financing from abroad, but there was no question that Ted Rogers was in control.