In the wireless sector, when we had our hearings on new media, we pointed out that the existing exemption is complete and there's no way for us to intervene, even if there is discrimination or self-serving, which are the normal reservations we have when we exempt somebody, because of the sector's competitiveness: unless you do something, we will step in. We suggested that there was an oversight and that it should be corrected, and we put it in our hearing for the fall.
The wireless industry came forward en bloc and said that they agreed with us, that it was an oversight, and asked us to please change that. We agree with that. We should have the right to intervene if there's self-serving or if there's discrimination, but the rest of it should be unregulated. It should be exempted. We filed an amendment and are seeking comments on it. Depending on what the input is, we will probably go along with that, because the wireless sector, at the present time, works very well and very competitively. We are of the firm belief that we should not step in unless there is market failure.
As I say, the thing is in process and I have to wait for the inputs to see what they are. But we've issued a notice saying that this is the offer from the wireless industry, that they are prepared to accept that we can step in should there be self-serving and discrimination, and we seek your comments on whether we should accept it or not.