Our view would be that in terms of new services, from a customer point of view the most important is our ability to offer multiple platforms. It's difficult for new entrants to come in and be able to do that. From a customer point of view there would probably be that kind of consolidation because of the advantages of one provider being able to offer multiple platforms.
On the other hand, we've learned over the past decade that it's very difficult to predict how technology is going to unfold. It's going to be very difficult to see what the new wireless applications are.
We have some interesting ideas. We've waited a bit to be able to invest in a new technology for the wireless services we'll be offering. They will offer further applications, and I think that's going to provide more richness.
It may well be that there will be different entrants, if they can figure out certain niches. It's the same in programming services. We used to think there would be a few companies, then it became maybe 20 or 25 companies, and then it came back to a few companies again. It will go back and forth. The one thing we've learned about technology is that you get a lot of start-ups, a lot of them get consolidated, and then you get a whole bunch of other start-ups again. It goes in waves. There's no real defined number; it cycles through.
I think the main thing you want to encourage is large companies and small companies to be innovative and entrepreneurial and provide them with the opportunities to develop new kinds of applications. The ability to develop those kinds of applications is probably the problem we face in Canada. For whatever set of reasons, the ability to develop new applications is a challenge for us in Canada. I think that's going to be really important as wireless unfolds as a new platform.