Can I just go back to the profit situation? My answer does relate to the point you're making right at the moment. We pointed out to the CRTC over the past few years that basic cable does not make money. The investments we make where we generate a return on our investment are in new services. Basic cable is so regulated and so constrained that there is not money to be made. As Bell pointed out to the commission, when the commission released its numbers before they released their value-for-signal discussions, they included in the broadcast distribution undertaking revenues telephony and Internet services. In the investments we've made, that's where the profits come from.
So if you're looking at Shaw as a company, you have to compare it with other companies of similar size and revenues and capital structures, and those comparisons are not.... Yes, we do well, but are we way up there in terms of a return on investment? No, we're not up there in terms of that kind of measurement. And that's the appropriate measurement to make for a capital-intensive company like ours.
In terms of trying to look at our customer satisfaction with our services, it's measured in the marketplace. We have nearly two million Internet customers because we provide value. We have a million phone customers—in the period of, what, four to five years—because we provide value. We maintain our basic cable subscribers because we maintain value. When I look at comparisons with the U.S. or in Europe, we own systems in the United States. Our basic cable in Canada is half the bill the people in Houston are paying.