Evidence of meeting #1 for Industry, Science and Technology in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was chair.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Jean Michel Roy

June 15th, 2011 / 4:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Sweet

My thinking right now, in the sense and spirit of this meeting at the moment, is that the only exception is when we get into a situation where a member has replaced another member and we just don't have specific enough language to keep it narrow. That's why I mentioned that. That would be the spirit in which I would act in that regard.

4:35 p.m.

NDP

Brian Masse NDP Windsor West, ON

Yes.

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Sweet

Of course you can't rely on me being the chair forever, but that's the spirit of the conversation presently--that the only exception is when there's a small number such as the Liberals are dealing with right now and they have to pair off in the meetings.

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

Cheryl Gallant Conservative Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke, ON

I find leaving yourself open to this potentially problematic, because there are certain rules we have to uphold within our parties. But an independent member has no rules, and there could be reasons for people wanting to--I don't like to use the word “sabotage”--steer us off course or make things public that are not necessarily so. I would like to add, after “members of Parliament”, “who are present at the committee at the in camera meeting”.

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Sweet

Even that is a little bit complex, because the clerk has just mentioned that if a regular member for some reason didn't show up that day because they were ill or something but they wanted to be involved in it, then they wouldn't have access to it so they wouldn't be able to get back up to speed.

Mr. Julian and then Mr. Hsu.

4:35 p.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP Burnaby—New Westminster, BC

How about this: “in consultation by members of the committee or by other members of Parliament who attended the meeting”? So members of the committee have access, and other members who are not permanent members of the committee, when they attend those meetings, have access to that information.

4:35 p.m.

NDP

Brian Masse NDP Windsor West, ON

That's “attended as a designate”. If you don't add “as a designate” then at least they were in the meeting.

4:35 p.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP Burnaby—New Westminster, BC

Okay. So it's “or by other members of Parliament who...”.

4:35 p.m.

NDP

Brian Masse NDP Windsor West, ON

You could say "at the specified meeting".

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Sweet

Or you could say “other members who are designated”.

4:35 p.m.

NDP

Brian Masse NDP Windsor West, ON

Yes. If they were in the room they could then have access.

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Sweet

So it's “or other members who were designated that attended the specific meeting”.

Is everybody clear on that? So it will be that one copy of the transcript of each in camera meeting be kept in the committee clerk's office for consultation by members of the committee or other members who were designated who attended the specific meeting.

4:35 p.m.

The Clerk

That didn't use Mr. Lake's wording. I don't know if he agrees.

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Sweet

Is that okay with you, Mr. Lake?

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Lake Conservative Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont, AB

If it's “other members who were designated that attended a meeting”, what does the designated part mean there? If it was in camera, by definition they had to be designated, right?

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Sweet

No, you and I can stroll into an in camera meeting as members.

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Lake Conservative Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont, AB

So any member of Parliament can come into the meeting?

4:35 p.m.

NDP

Brian Masse NDP Windsor West, ON

Yes.

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Lake Conservative Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont, AB

I don't understand. If that's the case, then I don't understand why any member of Parliament can't look at the transcripts. If it's the right of any member of Parliament to walk into an in camera meeting, our entire caucus could sit in on an in camera meeting if we wanted to.

Sorry. Someone is saying no. Could we have more than two Liberals sitting in on an in camera meeting? Could one be sitting at the table and one be sitting off to the side?

4:35 p.m.

The Clerk

No.

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Lake Conservative Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont, AB

So you have to switch off? We can't just stroll in, but we can switch off?

4:35 p.m.

The Clerk

It's the acting--

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Sweet

So it would cover it if we just said “or other members who attended the specific meeting”? Are you okay with that?

4:35 p.m.

The Clerk

Yes.

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Sweet

Is everybody okay with that?