As with all things, I think a careful balance is important. I agree that in terms of the issue of clarity, it's critically important. It's also making sure that you have smart regulation. When there's a policy objective you're attempting to obtain, you're attempting to obtain it to be, again, as minimally invasive as possible.
In the specific elements of intellectual property, there are areas where different companies will have different points of view. I certainly see the patent area would be one. I can say that I know companies on both sides of the equation. When it comes to business method patents, it depends on what drives their business. From the small start-up perspective, which is really the kind of companies that you're talking about here, frankly any regulation is seen as invasive, anything that is seen as stopping them from doing what they want to do. Part of functioning in a civilized society is that you learn to adapt to that. In my view there are a couple of regulations specifically that are potentially challenging. I know the business community has had some challenges with the prospective anti-spam bill in terms of it being very wide in its scope. There may be some issues there, but the regulations are still being hammered out.
Generally speaking, though, we haven't reached the point where Canada has become unpopular as a destination to establish a business.