Maybe I could speak to that. What we mean by that statement is that every patent system has its shortcomings and a certain number of constraints. When we look at RIM's history with NTP specifically, RIM has faced a number of challenges in the past in relation to how certain IP rights are enforced.
The abusive nature of how IP rights are leveraged is more in the context of people’s taking advantage of the shortcomings of patent offices around the world. That's what we mean. Where Canada can help is to think about how to make sure that the appropriate checks and balances are built into the IP regime, from beginning to end, so that only legitimate IP rights can be leveraged and enforced.
RIM certainly has no issue with a strong IP regime or with IPR holders that might have very strong IP rights. Where we do have an issue is with an IP regime that might be unbalanced and not necessarily have all the right checks and balances built into the system.
Madam Nolet mentioned the right to appeal. It's one of a number of examples where perhaps Canada can build more balance into the regime. Allowing the ability to question, the ability to patent, I think is important. That's just one example of where more checks and balances can be built into the system.