We do have some suggestions. We didn't intend to cover them today, but we do have some general notions that we believe in.
One of them, which I spoke about earlier, is this notion of having an opportunity to question the validity of the patent after it issues. That's really important to us. I think it's one of the ways you can ensure that the system is a little more balanced.
That's one example. Another example is patent expertise. We've seen in other jurisdictions that patent expertise really makes a big difference, and that's throughout the entire chain. That's not just in the judiciary; it's also at CIPO.
I know that CIPO has put a lot of effort into trying to strengthen their expertise in terms of what they do and how they do it, but as in many other things, I think, there's always room for improvement. Their searching ability, for example, is something that is important to companies like RIM, in that the better the job they do, the higher the quality of the patent examination, so expertise is really key. To the extent that we can work towards strengthening that throughout the entire chain, I think it's something to go after.