Definitely; in Spencer, the court said that individuals have an expectation of privacy in their online activities, and therefore, before you come knocking at the door of an ISP to get the identity behind an IP address, you need to have a warrant in hand.
Now with the sharing without consent provisions, are ISPs going to be exchanging information in copyright infringement cases, therefore without a warrant? Definitely, I think, if there's one clause that perhaps should be changed before the bill is passed, in my view it would be toning down the sharing without consent, making sure there is transparency exactly for this reason, to make sure it's consistent with the transparency trend.