I want to refer to some of the remarks from Dr. Hewitt because he said at the end of his comments that in a way technologies are agnostic.
We develop a technology almost always because we see at least an opportunity for some low-hanging fruit. We don't always see at the time when we're developing the technology and it's being initially deployed how it's going to be used in the end. What is the killer application isn't always the first thing that we've done. It's almost never a single technology that leads to that killer application and disruption.
One of the challenges is that what we need to do is create the ecosystem and the environment that encourages the creativity to push new ideas out as far as they can. Some of them will die because it turns out that either the technology isn't viable or the market isn't there, and others will go forward.
I feel it's the ecosystem, the people in it, and the ability to identify and advance the state of a technology from an initial discovery in a laboratory all the way to a prototype that's integrated so that we can put into the hands of industry; that's what we need to focus on.