Okay. I'm going to cut you off because I have one more question.
One of my questions is whether we are missing the boat a little here, because the common denominator seems to be money. All of these disruptive technologies will change and change the value of money to everybody, etc., but there are technologies that exist now that can be applied that could save us billions of dollars. Are we actually missing the boat there?
My example is fairly simple. If you take an insulin pump, it's quite expensive. It's great, but if you supplied everybody in Canada who is insulin dependent with an insulin pump, we could probably save billions in kidney failures and therefore kidney dialysis. I'm just using that as an example, but there have to be other existing technologies. What's your opinion?