Again, I think it's a really robust solution to attach value and payment. It's flexible. It encourages innovation.
I'm always very worried when I'm asked to prove damage because we've been through a period of six years now from the amendment of the Copyright Act that should have been no holds barred. By that I mean we should have been expanding. We should have been making a bigger contribution than we were able to make to the Canadian economy and to Canadian life.
If you attach value to the use of value, if you reward the creation of value, you have something that will respond to changes in technology, changes in buyer preferences, tastes in fiction. It's a very robust and flexible system. When you break that chain—and I worry when I hear that the solutions are the public lending right, for example—and say you will have an allowance and can do your thing. We're not a craft. We're a profession. We've earned our chops. We do what we do because it's valuable to us and it's valuable to others. Seeing that reflection in the return makes it possible for us to keep doing it and to adjust to the times.