I'm a big fan of the carrot-and-stick approach if you want to encourage things to happen. But if you're not going to play by the rules, then there are consequences for that.
Maybe you can provide the committee with details, but I hear a lot of these hypothetical or potential situations. If you would like to share the details of the case you mentioned, it would be interesting, because we don't get a lot of these coming forward to us. We just know somebody claims that they copyrighted, or they took something and photocopied it, or this or that. I haven't received a lot of evidence over the years of it taking place