In the brief you submitted, let us talk about the exception for retrieval tools. Those include content aggregators such as Google, which provides access to content. Google does not simply refer people; it actually gives them access to content. Some companies or individuals even pay to be ranked higher on Google. So companies like Google make money in multiple ways from content production, even though they give free access. Since they make money from that free access, they should give back part of that money to those who created the content.
We focused on this tool in particular, but I think Mr. Tamaro has identified other exceptions in the act.