Yes, I understand. What we were basically referring to was that there are various business models for moving forward. Some would immediately have all their content be open access and there wouldn't be anything more to it than that. There are other journals that earn considerable income and sell their content to secondary aggregators, which sign contracts with foreign aggregators, secondary publishers, really, and make them available. They're taking their earned income and putting it together with their costs, effectively, to make it open access as soon as possible, but they are trying to maintain a presence in the marketplace to earn enough income to have a quality journal.
On May 11th, 2018. See this statement in context.