We believe that the regulations in place and the exceptions referred to—warranty and that type of thing for contacting customers in the flow of a business relationship—are presently wide enough. If there are additional factors that have to be thought of, then doing that through a regulation is something that could be done quickly and easily. I don't believe you need to change the act or reverse the consent obligation on the consumer so that they have to opt out.
My concern is that small items will be blown up to completely change this act, and consumers then will bear the burden or the costs of pushing away spam, whereas we've decided to try to make the regime the other way. I'm not opposed to legitimate business concerns with compliance. The act has only been in place for three years. It's possible that there are some unintended consequences, but again, that would normally be done in the regulations, not by changing the act.