Yes.
I'm quickly going to go back the other way now to Mr. Geist.
One of the things that hasn't been brought up too much about the private right of action but that was mentioned by you was about Australia and others. Here's my concern. We have a model right now such that the policing of all of this still falls to the public service with the CRTC. We can't forget that the CRTC is publicly funded. That's the sole recourse for the public to actually get some type of revenue back for all this behaviour that's bad for the economy and for businesses, and that is unfair for consumers who actually subscribe and pay for all these things, and it's only through the fines that would actually be applied.
I think there's a real issue with the 30 days and not even providing notice. I think that's a real problem. That's a communication issue that's really serious, actually, especially for a larger businesses. That should be looked at very seriously by the CRTC with regard to the 30 days. That's just inappropriate in many respects. Notification would be helpful. That's the easy stuff.
If we take away the private right of action, why should the public have to pay entirely for this thing through the CRTC and through the fact that we have to foot lawsuits?