Informally, there have been some discussions. Naturally, for example, since I have been consulting directly with CRTC, they are evolving. What they are dealing with is evolving. They themselves are learning. There's a very steep learning curve in trying to deal with this, so they are getting better at it.
One of the things that struck me when I first saw the draft CASL back in 2012, I guess it was, was that it covered everything, and it was written in a way that it could be extended as necessary for the technology.
I do not think that the law itself is too narrow or too restrictive. It's more a matter of education and deciding when this particular area becomes a problem and where you allocate your resources.