The law already has provisions for a lot of that material, for a lot of that sort of thing: if there's an innocent mistake, you write a letter and tell us you're not going to do that again. That's actually in the law.
It strikes me that it's fairly gentle in that sense, in that someone can avoid major penalties, or any penalty altogether, if they can establish they were operating reasonably well and were doing reasonable things, and they simply made a mistake. For example, there are the override provisions from private right of action across to CRTC and so on.
I think the law is pretty well done that way. It is reasonable. It's not, “You did this, and it will cost you this amount of change.” It's not done that way. From a background of—