I've expanded on some of it. I'll go over some of that again. Let me know if there's any aspect of it that's especially unclear.
For our Competition Bureau complaint, the issue specifically is that Bell and Rogers have for years inflated wholesale rates before the CRTC, keeping competitors' costs high and ensuring that competitors' retail pricing also has to be high.
At the same time, especially over the past few years, they've introduced these flanker brands, which are specifically targeted at competing with competitors. They are really Bell and Rogers brands. Virgin and Fido are what I'm talking about. They act like they're competitors. People in the market even perceive them as being alternatives to the big providers. They are explicitly designed to compete with wholesalers. They undercut us on our pricing.
As for the way they do that, they really know what all of our costs are, right? We're buying services from Bell and Rogers at wholesale rates, some of them regulated and some of them unregulated. They know exactly what our costs are, and they undercut us right at that point. If the CRTC's final rates from August 2019 were implemented, that would do away with that strategy. We would then have the space to move to where we could price lower, and we think that all retail pricing would then come down. Effectively, we would be disciplining their pricing, whereas right now they're disciplining our pricing.