Can I start by saying that it's both yes and...? It's both that the specific deal is a problem and also that it shows the destruction of 15 years of trying to have a fourth wireless player. This is the last chapter, and it will kill the policy if it goes through. This specific deal is bad, because in going forward to three, prices will go up. We had a merger in Austria, for example, from four to three, and prices went up 95% for the player that got taken over.
On March 31st, 2021. See this statement in context.