Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thanks to all the witnesses.
Earlier, Mr. Harris, I had the impression I was in a movie in which a parliamentary committee was conducting a study on an artificial intelligence bill. You were telling the people on this committee that the third world war was about to arrive and that it would be technological, by which I mean that no weapons of any kind would be used. Listening to you today, I felt like swearing, but unfortunately, I couldn't.
My greatest frustration, and I think I'm not alone around this table to feel that way, is that the bill before us includes a series of elements, underpinned by three principles, which are privacy, the courts and artificial intelligence. However, according to the testimony we heard today, artificial intelligence should have been dealt with in a separate bill.
We are being told that there have already been major advances in artificial intelligence since the start of our study, including the signing of a memorandum of understanding in England. Some countries decided to introduce a voluntary code while awaiting the adoption of various bills.
Ms. Castets-Renard, you spoke about a trialogue that would address certain issues. You are no doubt talking about Europe. Mr. Gagné, you also spoke earlier about measures that were proposed in reports you submitted to the European Union. Are you talking about the same thing? I'm not sure I've understood properly.