Specifically with regard to the definition of “high-impact”, the minister's amendments are a very significant step in the right direction. Including the general-purpose systems is very good. For the particular schedule, our main recommendation is to include not just use cases but also capacities. This is because a lot of these capacities, especially things like autonomous self-improvement or [Technical difficulty—Editor], and I can go into details of what they are, are dangerous by default. You don't necessarily want your system to be making a thousand copies of itself onto somebody else's computer without necessarily controlling it. Our recommendation would be to expand use cases and capabilities.
The second piece is that this bill is specifically focused on making systems available for use in the context of international trade, which will catch a lot of it, but it's not going to catch all of it, specifically open source and also R and D. It's understandable to want to give companies the ability to do research and development without legislation, but the problem is that, for the most advanced systems, once that system is built, it can be hacked, stolen and misused. Accidents can happen at the R and D stage, so R and D has to be included in the bill, as well as government, open source and military.