Thank you for the question.
First of all, I would say it doesn't have democratic legitimacy if it hasn't involved all stakeholders, and that hasn't happened yet.
The second thing about this is that, as I said, the existential risk is gaslighting to take you away from the near-term risks, which the other witnesses are drawing us to, and that's a real tactic.
I would say—and this is most critical and has been part of my journey in learning this—that you'll notice there's been a tremendous effort to stay away from rights by those who don't want effectiveness. We are in a new era and if we were writing our charter of rights, we would incorporate these kinds of rights in an information age: the rights to dignity, privacy and thought, and the rights to not have misinformation or manipulation.
I think you have to get the core pieces right, and those involve determining which human rights matter up front, how we work with those within the context of real harm that is happening, and how not to be gaslit on things that take us away from what the real issue is. Businesses use the tactic of gaslighting and confusing people to keep them away from the root issues.