You've answered well. Maybe that explains why we'll have to discuss a subpoena later today. Thank you for the clarification.
I will now address the representatives of the Competition Bureau.
We are currently studying Bill C-56 in Parliament. The Canadian competition regime is quite special—it's not your fault, you have a mandate—in that it places a lot of emphasis on efficiency gains. Elsewhere in the world, people try to ascertain whether efficiencies affect the consumer in any way, shape or form. I'm thinking of consumer surplus, for example, but I won't go into the technical details.
If Bill C-56 had been in force, would the transaction between Rogers and Shaw have taken place in the same form, in your opinion?