Absolutely.
Through the amendments being offered as well as in the text of the bill itself, as I noted, the most fundamental shift is in declaring that minors' information is sensitive and needs to be treated as such. That's an elevated bar for the purposes of a privacy management program, and it would engender a very significant level of scrutiny on the part of the Privacy Commissioner with respect to ensuring that safeguards are in place.
In a number of spaces, we speak, through the amendments, about the notion of ensuring that minors have the capacity to have their information thought of as sensitive and can have their parent or guardian potentially act on their behalf to do so. It's also about having the understanding in place that if a minor has the capacity to do so, they are able to act on their own behalf.
As potentially a necessity to be implemented by folks, “the best interests of the child” is obviously very good declaration language. In terms of precise obligations related to that, I think we have suggested that it's important to get at the construct of being able to act on behalf of a minor and to also have the capacity of the minor understood in cases where a minor would be able to act on their own.