Why in the preamble—and maybe you can't answer this—was the...? I'll call out one of the things in this amendment, which is the focus on a very specific issue around personal data with regard to minors and their best interests. MP Vis spoke eloquently to that issue. Why was that not seen to be a priority? In the minister's opening speech during second reading in the House and in my conversations with him, he said the primary purpose of this whole bill was about protecting children's rights. However, it seems that when we go through it, we see there's actually very little reference to that at all. There's just a reference to minors once in the definitions section.
If the government felt that what this bill was doing was protecting children's rights to a greater extent than the existing law, why wasn't that more robustly put in the preamble, the purpose section and various other parts of the bill?