Profiling is not defined in the bill, even though we know very well, indirectly, that it occurs. I would even go so far as to say that racial profiling is very important for a number of service providers who do mass data collection. I don't want to get into a debate, but we have seen on a number of occasions—in Montreal in particular—the whole issue of racial profiling in the public safety file.
Inevitably, individuals find themselves associated with certain groups that are profiled based on elements of their private life, such as race or age. Could the lack of an extremely explicit definition of profiling in the bill put these individuals at risk, since they are profiled without even knowing it and will, therefore, not have the opportunity to challenge the law going forward, in one way or another?