I'll turn to Mr. Chhabra, but I'll note that one of the fundamental aspects we've tried to draw out over the course of the discussion today is the importance of some sort of context-specific interpretation tool at the outset of the list. It's something that would read like, “due to the context of its collection, use or disclosure, an individual has a high expectation of privacy and may include”. One aspect is context. The second is whether that's deemed to include, by definition, all component members of a class of information or it's indicative.
Those are two very important points that we're getting at. I think in the current formulation, there isn't the same understanding of the context of collection, use or disclosure, and the list can be added to, but is definitive in its contents.