You're right to point that out, Mr. Généreux, because the measures that have been taken in recent years promote competition, both in terms of switching from one network to another, and in terms of being able to take advantage of the policy you mentioned, the MVNOs, with conditions for network construction.
Players are prevented from engaging in speculation in what are called spectrum auctions, because there's now an obligation attached to that. When you buy spectrum, you have an obligation to build a network over the next seven years. If you don't, you lose the right to use that spectrum. As a result, all of these measures have ensured that Canadians can ultimately benefit from the best competitive conditions.
That said, some considerations are sometimes extremely surprising. For the same product, called fibre optics, or FTTH, the price will be $69 in Quebec compared to $89 in Toronto.
Could that be considered dumping or anti‑competitive measures? Of course, Quebeckers benefit, but give us access to the networks as well, just as we, Videotron, give access to users. It's called third‑party Internet access. Bell, on the other hand, has just bought almost all of these network users. There are measures like that.
Obviously, we're aware of this because it's what we do every day. However, everything has to be analyzed by the Competition Bureau, and you can well imagine that, as players in this industry, we don't hesitate to inform the Competition Bureau to put an end to these practices, which are harmful to Quebeckers and Canadians.