Mr. Chair, I did confer, after you instructed me to perhaps consult the notice of motion, to confirm that it hasn't changed. The direction that Mr. Cooper went, which deals with the analogous situation between what Mr. Perkins raised, the response from the commissioner and the comparison to another decision of the witness, is what we are looking at. I checked. The notice of motion is exactly the one that was passed in the summer. It's based on the motion that was passed at the Standing Order 106(4) meeting in the summer, so you can rest assured that I did read it.
I understand that the Standing Orders are the same at all of the committees, so I appreciate the guidance and being welcomed here. However, with respect, Chair, the analogy that Mr. Cooper draws is absolutely not any further than the analogy that Mr. Turnbull drew to SDTC in the House, which did not deal with the conflict of interest that we're talking about with Ms. Verschuren. Equal opportunity to draw analogies or deal with related subjects would be appreciated. That's all we're looking for.
I can assure you that we were well consulted, and Mr. Perkins briefed us very well on the standard operating procedures here.