Thank you, Mr. Chair. I'm going to support the motion.
We had some informal discussions, and I know there's a concern about the last part and making sure we focus on that, but it won't stop us if there is an emergency or if something else comes up. I appreciate the parliamentary secretary bringing this forward, given that we could go around in circles on some of this material, and we'll be stopped from doing that.
Also, obviously, I'm very interested in the credit card study. It's something I've been after for a while in terms of having more accountability, and I appreciate the time that we'll put into that.
I also try to appreciate that we've worked a lot on Bill C-27. I think that all parties here have been trying to find their way through this. It's historic, especially the issue of artificial intelligence. That aside, we've done a lot of stuff on the privacy aspect and we seem to be stuck at one particular point on the tribunal. If there's time to fix that in a way that's comfortable, I think that is better than trying to work through it with the officials here in real time, as opposed to a proper plan coming back.
For those reasons, I'll support the motion. I appreciate the nature and tone of this discussion, because this committee has historically worked really well together. We've had some moments recently on a few things, but at the same time, I'd like to spend my time here wisely, and I think this is a good program for going forward, so I'll be supporting the motion. If we do have an emergency or something else pops up in the interim, this doesn't stop a member from raising that issue.
I get the intent and why it's in there, and we'll deal with it as we go forward.
With that, I say thank you, Mr. Chair.