Thank you, Chair.
Thank you to the witnesses for appearing.
I want to focus on interchange rates, which are the fees charged by the card issuers for the transaction. They're obviously set by the credit card companies. We've heard that throughout this testimony and in the testimony of Visa and Mastercard as well. Again, these are the fees charged by the card issuers, and a percentage of them is obviously kept by the card issuers themselves.
We had Mastercard appear before committee a few meetings ago. They said:
We set interchange to maximize participation—for our banks to make cards available and for merchants to accept them. Our priority in setting rates is to maintain a balance.
Mastercard does not receive interchange revenue. Were it left to merchants, they would want the benefits of card acceptance without paying for it, but that would make card issuance unattractive to banks. Were it up to the banks, they would want high interchange to maximize revenue, but then merchants would not want to accept the cards.
I found that testimony to be a bit disingenuous, because we know that merchants, obviously, will pass on a large percentage, if not all, of the cost of interchange fees to their consumers, the customers. When we look at banks, again, I don't want to hear in testimony that you don't set the interchange fees—we know that to be true—but I'm looking at the statement that Mastercard made about incentivizing banks to be card issuers.
We've heard in testimony that 1.4% is the average interchange fee that's charged. Obviously, that can vary across different products and different banks. What I wanted to ask of the different banks—and we can go in order of the initial speaking order—is this: Do you feel as though the interchange fees could be lowered and card issuance would still be attractive for the banks to engage in?