Yes, and if you'll forgive me, I'll also speak with my professor hat on and say that actually, yes, we are training phenomenal talent. The challenge is that they're all going elsewhere. We are training phenomenal talent. We're very successful at Photonic because we can recruit them back, but that's unusual.
To your point about funding, we've heard on many panels before this that a very successful model is a DARPA-like model. Having an objective that could be bid on and met by any of a number of corporate organizations as well as research organizations would be a phenomenal way to model this, in addition to having procurement contracts. You can have a contract for an objective rather than for an actual physical deliverable. Both would be fantastic models, but they're not the same as a grant.
One example is that of a satellite repeater. I wanted to discuss the opportunity to build out the quantum Internet across Canada, which has a unique satellite-based deployment that is not being focused on in Europe to the same degree. We have an opportunity to have a giant competition for bids, and yes, to have some companies with ratchet clauses, such that if they're not meeting their milestones, they don't get it. The scale of the funding needs to be at the level of $50 million to $100 million per project for it to be competitive with what is on offer by the U.K., the U.S. and Europe.