The first thing I'd have to say is that competition law hasn't necessarily always had as a vocation to make a level playing field among all sizes of enterprise. I do think that's a legitimate question to ask. I'm not sure that's going to be solved in small amendments to the act; that's going to be part of a larger consultation.
On the question of what we can do now, I would flip the question around and say that perhaps a lot of regulation about participation in the digital economy is not appropriate for smaller enterprises, or needs to be rethought or adapted or simplified. That may very well be the case.
I think the greater problem facing small and medium-sized enterprises is that the large players, those who control what we call the digital ecosystem, control the actual marketplace. They are subject to less regulation and governance than they should be. Part of the problem might be reining in...the fact that most of the evolution of digital markets has happened in a way that is oriented towards private economic interest, and that's because governments haven't been present, putting out the guideposts and saying there are limits to what you can do out here.
It's not true that regulation or governance is anti-innovation or anti-competitive. The evidence is very, very clear that you cannot draw a straight line there between regulating.... However, we need to think about whom we are regulating and for what purpose.