I remember that this one came up. I believe it was the sponsor of the bill who first floated that idea in the very first meeting.
Throughout the course of the study of this bill, I don't think we found any witness who had actually been consulted about the bill before coming to committee. Indeed, I found quite a few who had never even heard about it until I reached out to them.
I don't see what has changed since that first meeting to justify a compressed timeline. I'd be open to hearing other views on that subject.