Mr. Fillmore, I'm still a little confused, but not about what you thought might clarify it a little more. I don't know what you mean by “supporting outcomes”. Is that proof of success on some specific metric? I don't understand the phrase.
My second question is.... This about the Prairies, but we use the word “regions” in the amendment. Is this contemplating something broader than the Prairies?
Those are two questions I have. I still don't understand “supporting outcomes”. I get “fostering job creation” and the economic transfer of success of training or retraining, or whatever you're getting at. Are you trying to say that it has to be done in such a way that we can prove there are results? Is that what you're trying to get at—and what are “regions”?