I'm not as much of an expert as Ms. Lovrics, but I will say that this is the chickens coming home to roost. We have a very aggressive copyright protection scheme that we've agreed to internationally and that I believe the tide is turning on. Consumers and others are starting to see that it's too aggressive. For example, we have people today saying that the hard goods they need to grow food in this country can't be used, because they'll be bricked, and they can't lose those days. That's overreach.
Now, I can't change the international treaties, but what I'm seeing is that any threat to the technical protection measures is seen as some kind of existential threat to the entire copyright regime. There have to be limits somewhere. We're trying to find a place in this bill where it can give some more wiggle room to consumers and to small businesses to actually be able to use the products they paid for and not be tripped up by copyright law. Really, international treaty or not, I think we've got to have some scope here, or this gets ridiculous.