I believe you've put that clearly, Mr. Lemire.
I'm all for transparency. There is, of course, the annual report, and there are other things that we can do in that area. There could be a judicial review. I want to provide parliamentarians with as much information as possible.
However, it's important to know that our decisions are often based on issues of intelligence. We therefore need to strike a balance.
As for the annual report, we're prepared to look at that with members of the committee. We can try to see whether people want more information in it, provided that we can maintain this essential balance. As you know, it's a process which, by its very nature, requires us to maintain the trust of investors, and involves various non-disclosure considerations for each competing enterprise.
I believe that through our policy statements in the annual report on what we are doing, and also in our approach to the annual report, we provide a lot more information than we used to. Various people, and my colleagues, will no doubt recall that for Neo Lithium, we were able to give out more information than in the past. The senior officials will be able to tell you more about that.
I'm in favour of this transparency, but at the same time, I believe we need to maintain this balance with respect to information, precisely in order to be able to make the right decisions.