Very well.
If I understand correctly, the government's position on the merits of this investment is entirely based on the Trillium Network's study. Of course, no one is against doing the right thing and helping the environment.
Contrary to what we might expect, the minister delighted in the fact that your report deals with only 8% or so of all the spending, so only the investment in the plants, not with production. Can you clear that up? Is the minister right to say that the return on investment applies only to the plant portion, or does it apply to the entire project and all the subsidies?