I don't think so. Minors under the age of 13 wouldn't have the capacity to consent. That would be protected. Data would be protected otherwise.
There is an idea about specifying “under the age of 18”. It works right now. I don't think you have to do it.
The key thing in the statute, which goes to the heart of your concern.... I think the concern of everyone in the room, certainly myself, is that the protection of minors is very important, but there's express contemplation already in the statutory framework that this is sensitive data, and that has a flow-through impact and would be treated well, certainly from a statutory interpretation perspective.