First of all, the concept of personal information, or more specifically identifiability, is well established in Canadian jurisprudence. If there is a serious risk of possibility of identifying an individual directly or indirectly or just contextually, it will be deemed to be identifiable. That is a very high bar, given the environment, especially the contextual part, as there is more dynamic data and more data, etc. That's what I was speaking to.
The injection of our proposed amendment was to align the current definition of “anonymize” in the CPPA to ensure that we're consistent with the jurisprudence and consistent and interoperable with the statutory regimes across the country.