Okay.
I want to make some general remarks on this amendment and on the motion as a whole to let you know where I stand on it, or where we stand. I won't speak for all my colleagues here, but it's safe to say we take this matter seriously. There were allegations of mismanagement. The minister has known about those and hasn't been sitting on his hands. He's acted, as you know, as Mr. Perkins said. You've probably heard the testimony the minister gave last night at the ethics committee. I know Mr. Perkins and Mr. Masse were both there.
Mr. Masse, I know you got to ask the minister questions, which is great.
We know the minister asked for an independent review of the agency based on the allegations of mismanagement. That review has been completed. That has resulted in an action plan and the freezing of the accounts of SDTC. All of this is public knowledge. On top of that, the Auditor General is doing an audit, so we know that process is under way. We also know our ministry has also hired a firm to do an HR management review as a parallel process to the Auditor General's audit. We also have two other committees looking at this. Public accounts and ethics are looking at the very same topic, and both are doing a study.
Was I wrong about that?