Industry Committee on Nov. 9th, 2023

Evidence of meeting #96 for Industry, Science and Technology in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was aida.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

Bill C-27

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Alexander Jarvie Partner, Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP, As an Individual

François Joli-Cœur Partner, Borden Ladner Gervais, As an Individual

Scott Lamb Partner, Clark Wilson LLP, As an Individual

Carole Piovesan Co-founder and Partner, INQ Law, As an Individual

David Young Principal, Privacy and Regulatory Law Counsel, David Young Law, As an Individual

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Ryan Turnbull Liberal Whitby, ON

Well, you haven't given a good rationale for it.

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Perkins Conservative South Shore—St. Margarets, NS

I don't have to. I don't answer to you.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Ryan Turnbull Liberal Whitby, ON

Now you're being combative.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Joël Lightbound

Mr. Perkins, when one member has the floor—

November 9th, 2023 / 5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Perkins Conservative South Shore—St. Margarets, NS

[Inaudible—Editor]

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Joël Lightbound

—that person speaks. I appreciate the heckling in the House, but this is not the House. This is committee. I don't accept—

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Perkins Conservative South Shore—St. Margarets, NS

I'd like you to enforce the rules on relevancy and repetition.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Joël Lightbound

I am. Now I'm enforcing the rules on heckling around this table. For the sake of decorum, I would ask you to keep it down.

Mr. Turnbull has the floor.

Yes, Mr. Sorbara.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Francesco Sorbara Liberal Vaughan—Woodbridge, ON

On a quick point of order, perhaps we can avoid some of the crosstalk and focus on the issue at hand.

Mr. Perkins, if Mr. Turnbull is repeating comments, then you can rise on a point of order and state that. Let's do it the proper way, and we can get through what we need to get through.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Joël Lightbound

Yes, Mr. Turnbull.

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Ryan Turnbull Liberal Whitby, ON

I'd like to propose an amendment.

I propose removing sections (b) and (c) of this. I think “names of any and all meeting attendees” is perfectly acceptable and could be produced in pretty short order.

I would amend the motion by excluding (b) and (c).

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Joël Lightbound

There's an amendment to remove (b) and (c). You've all heard the proposed amendment by Mr. Turnbull.

Do we have unanimous consent for removing (b) and (c)?

(Amendment agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])

We're back to the motion as amended by Mr. Lemire and subsequently by Mr. Turnbull.

Do we have unanimous consent to adopt the motion, or should I put it to a vote? I see no more speakers.

We'll go to a recorded division on the motion as amended.

(Motion as amended agreed to: yeas 10; nays 0 [See Minutes of Proceedings])

Thank you, Mr. Masse. You scared me for a while. We're back to our traditional consensus style of work here at the committee. I'm happy about that. It's passed unanimously.

Thank you, everyone, for your collaboration on this. It brings us straight to the hour.

We stayed on time and on budget.

Thank you very much to the interpreters, support staff and analysts.

I wish you all a good week in your respective ridings, a good weekend and a good evening.

The meeting is adjourned.