I have quite a few things to say, but I appreciate the debate.
We're in a situation here on the day of the fall economic statement, which is fine. Members have chosen to call a meeting under Standing Order 106(4), which is normally meant to apply to an emergency meeting. Obviously there are enough members who feel that this an urgent debate that should take precedence over government legislation, which is Bill C-27, which I think we've all agreed is a really high priority for this committee.
I have quite a few concerns with some of the assertions that members opposite have made, which I don't feel are factual, and I will say why.
This feels to me like another delay tactic on Bill C-27, which I think again we have all....