Perhaps I can take the first part regarding the quantifiable things and other international models. I can then turn to Charles.
The question regarding benchmarks and what is quantifiable bedevils any kind of programming that deals with democratization and human rights. How do you measure these things?
However, there is a way of trying to focus the discussion so that you are asking specific questions on specific issues and asking for improvement in those sectors. Let's take the example of children's rights, for instance. If the dialogue topic is children's rights or racism or something like that, then you can ask what specific programs China is willing to put into practice for the next three years that are going to alleviate or improve the situation. In those programs, what are some of the things we can work on together to improve the situation?
It's one thing to sit in a room as the dialogue seems to be taking place and discuss in general children's rights, forced sterilization, women's rights, racism, or whatever. It's another thing to say that they'll develop an action plan--it's not up to us; you develop an action plan, and we'll have benchmarks. We'll think through where the situation in 2008, 2009, or 2010 should be, compared to now. I think there are ways of measuring the progress any country makes in increments like that.
Regarding the international aspect, I think Mr. Burton is better to answer that.